About Charles Dawkins Jr.
Charles Dawkins Jr. was raised in Ohio by great parents. He received his undergraduate degree from Ohio University's Honors Tutorial College ("Religio, Doctrina Civilitas, Prae Omnibus Virtus"). Subsequent to receiving his degree from the Honors Tutorial College, he attended American University's Washington College of Law. He was fortunate to have not only great teachers at Ohio University and American University but also great faculty mentors.
He practices law in the current areas: Federal and State Criminal Defense, Immigration Law, New Jersey State Appellate Law, Third Circuit Court of Appeals Criminal and Civil Appeals, Appeals to the United States Supreme Court, Habeas Corpus Briefs and serious injury Personal Injury Law.
- Has Served as a Former Assistant Municipal Prosecutor for the City of Newark, New Jersey
- Is Currently on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals Criminal Panel Attorneys List
- Has experience in trying State and Federal Criminal Cases
- Has successfully argued before the New Jersey Supreme Court I consider arguing before the New Jersey Supreme Court the highlight of my career. The client never gave up! The lawyers never gave up!
- Has Appealed Case to the United States Supreme Court
- Has Argued Civil Cases in New Jersey Federal District Court
- Has experience obtaining Asylum, Withholding of Removal, Convention Against Torture and Cancellation of Removal for citizens of Asia, Africa, Middle East, South America, South East Asia, and Eastern Europe.
- Has experience obtaining Acquittals or Dismissals in New Jersey State Court, New Jersey Federal District Criminal Court, and New Jersey Family Court.
- Has experience in Appeals decided by the Board of Immigration Appeal
- Has experience representing many clients charged with Immigration Aggravated Felonies and he has obtained relief from Deportation---rare case but happens.
- AWARDS: 2016 receipient of The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Criminal Trial Lawyers and Who's Who Top Attorneys
Currently Avvo rated '10" 14 reviews
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION MEMBER: Immigration law is a specialty. I consider membership in this organization to be a requirement to stay on top of my game; keep my library updated; and to get updates on significant issues that a person will only know if he is getting updated New Jersey chapter information.
NEW JERSEY STATE BAR ASSOCIATION MEMBER: New Jersey requires private attorneys to take a certain amount of Continuing Legal Education Courses. Membership gives me a discount on courses and helps me stay abreast of the law. Membership also permits me to conduct legal research on the site. I take as many as time and money will permit.
Criminal Defense: A third party may pay the fee, but I only discuss the facts of the case and the strategy of the case with the Adult client. If I discuss the case with another party present --- I may lose attorney client privilege. Clients who are not married to their girlfriends/boyfriends are instructed to refrain from speaking about the case to them or family members. Paying money for the client fails to affect me or give the third party any special rights.
Juveniles: I always inform the parents about the case when a juvenile is being charged with a crime. If the person is a young adult, I will talk to the parents as it relates to the plea but not the facts of the case.
Immigration Clients: In immigration court I will speak with girlfriends and relatives. I often need their support to get supporting documents and in some cases, the citizen relative is essential for immigration relief. I have represented people from all parts of the continent and many different religions.
Appeals Clients: The trial record and decision legal basis are the most important documents for an appeal. I will discuss with the client and family members their opinions as it relates to the trial. Usually both parties want to attack the lawyer, the judge, prosecutor or all. You are entitled to a fair trial but not a perfect trial.
Attorney recently successfully argued S.T. v. 1515 Broad Street L.L.C. 241 NJ. 257 (N.J. 2020) before the New Jersey Supreme Court. New Jersey Supreme Court Practice is complicated in which the proper pleadings must be filed on time and in the proper format. The Attorney must be prepared in Oral Argument with a clear plan as to the relief that is sought. The Attorney was highly impressed with the New Jersey Supreme Court Justices.
The New Jersey Supreme Court hears a very small percentage of cases every year and a N.J. Appellate Lawyer can practice a lifetime and never appear before the N.J. Supreme Court. Appearing before the N.J. Supreme Court is the highlight of my career. However, more importantly the New Jersey Supreme Court in its ruling defined the procedures that lower courts must follow to take property rights (Settlement) and self-determination from an alleged incompetent person. This was a very important decision for all New Jersey residents.
The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed the Appellate Court ruling to render a de novo opinion as to the relevant statutory law. Credit must also be given to the late Robert Vort who was a highly respected Appellate Lawyer who spent his legal career arguing on behalf of appellants. Robert Vort wrote the brief at the Appellate level but unfortunately became incapacitated, consequently he was unable to appeal to the Supreme Court for discretionary Certification.
A Federal Criminal Case that the Attorney unsuccessfully appealed is United States v. Thompson, No. 09-4154 (3rd Cir. September 13, 2010).
Counsel has successfully obtained relief for clients for Asylum, Convention Against Torture (person committed aggravated felonies)(rare), and Cancellation of Removal. Counsel has also reopened case through Appeal to the BIA and obtained Stay of Deportation through DHS (Difficult).
Moreover, Counsel has represented or consulted and is familiar with the country conditions of the following countries: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica,Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Egypt, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guatemala , Guyana, Haiti, India , Indonesia, Jamaica, Kenya, Lebanon ,Liberia, Lithuania, Maccedonia, Mexico, Morrocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Phillipines, Poland, Romani people, Russia, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Ukraine, Uruaguay, Vietnam and Trinidad Tobago.
The Attorney must conduct research, affidavits, brief writing, motion practice, and sometimes investigations to effectively represent a person in Immigration court. The Judge is the trier of fact , authority regarding application of law to fact, and sole decision maker regarding relief. Judges hear a lot of cases and are knowledgeable.
The lawyer must be well-prepared or the client will certainly lose. You can not wing an immigration proceeding. If a client does not show up for hearing---he/she can be deported in absentia. Statistically, clients with lawyers stand a better chance of winning then those without lawyers. However, ultimately the compelling facts of the case as it relates to the legal underpinnings of Immigration law are the deteminative factor.
The easiest way to lose an immigration case is to lie. Judges have heard most of them and they are likely to apprehend the insincerity. Never underestimate DHS---they have many research techniques at their disposal. The lawyer can help assure the integrity of the client. Many people who are seeking relief are desperate, and the incentive to fabricate is understandable and human.
The United States Immigration laws have myriad ways that a person without status can obtain status. However, obtaining a criminal record complicates the process for not only undocumented people but also permanent residents.
TRIAL AND PLEA PHILOSOPHY FOR CRIMINAL AND CIVIL COURT
My high school American history teacher who was also a very confident but humble lawyer taught me a lesson at an early age. He was a World War II purple heart combat veteran, but he defended conscientious objectors during the Vietnam War Era. He was courageous and intelligent, but not a braggadocio.
On a historical note former President John Adams defended British Soldiers accused of perpetrating the Boston Massacre---he was the only lawyer who would take the case. For the most part all those officers were aquitted of the crimes.
My values are antithetical to some of the people who I have defended in Criminal Court, Immigration Court, and Civil Practice It is not my duty to judge people but to assure that people are effectively represented as supported by the United States Constitution. In most cases, a trial occurs because the State's evidence is inconsistent with investigative truth, I am unable to get a factual basis from the client, apparent procedural due process issues, or an immigrant will be deported with a guilty plea.
In civil Practice, the Defendant may have a scorched earth policy. Where the evidence does not matter as to the injury---"this company does not settle". The companies that I have sued all have a lot of money and they can hire the best Law Firms to bill them for their time. On the other hand the client may be unwilling to accept a settlement that many peope would consider fair and reasonable.
In the NJ Supreme Court case that I argued S.T. v 1515 Broad St., LLC 241 N.J. 257 (N.J. 2020), the injury occurred over a decade ago, settlement was offered, the client just does not want to settle for that amount of money and chose to fight all the way to the NJ Supreme Court which took years and three different appellate Attorneys.
The NJ Supreme Court made it clear that procedural court rules regarding competency hearings must be followed before the Superior Court Judge takes a person's right to decide the appropriate settlement amount.
Some of the injuries and particularly wrongful death actions---no amount of money will adequately compensate for the loss.
In Criminal practice some decisions are reserved for the client---notably whether to plead guilty, waive the right to a jury trial, testify in one's own behalf, and forego an appeal. McCoy v. Louisiana, 584 U.S. ____,_____, (2018) Slip Op., at 6.
If a person wants to plea guilty I attempt to assure that the guilty plea is voluntary, knowing, and with a full understanding of the consequences. The person must be guilty. The system fails when innocent people plea guilty. If a person is in fact guilty, a plea bargain is an excellent means to reduce his/her exposure to the penalties of the law. In reality approximately 95 percent of State and 97 are convictions.
This high number is in part because most cases in the Federal System are pled out.
I personally believe and practice all the precepts of the Christian Faith, but I also believe in defending traditional notions of fundamental fairness and Due Process guarantees of the United States Constitution for ALL people.
Quote of the Day:
"The things that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun."
"To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society."
Call me. I give free consultations for most criminal law matters and personal injury cases, but I charge a fee for most Immigration and Appeals consultations.
Contact Charles Dawkins Jr. in Elizabeth, New Jersey, and hire a dedicated Criminal Defense Attorney, Deportation Lawyer, and Criminal Appeals Lawyer today.